Is it possible to use a digital camera instead of a professional camera for wedding pics? - pics of brazilian
Is there really a difference?
Is it possible to use a digital camera instead of a professional camera for wedding pics? - pics of brazilian
Is there really a difference?
5 comments:
It depends on the quality of the camera and the ability of the operator.
I decided to use 2 students of photography. However, photographs taken pictures of my sister with my digital camera were excellent Cheapo. You know what portraits, to do something that students know how the photography is done.
If the official pictures are not the beginning and the end for you and you've got some people who will only consider working with your digital camera. It would be good with, but my girlfriend wanted to "better" pictures and the guests do not want to lose anything.
It was a wedding on a budget and everyone says that my "price is" in harmony with it. My sister spent $ 1500 for the photographer and got rid of almost all photos 7 years later, after her divorce. Ouch. The only ones who are held without deduction, or his mother.
In my opinion, is to document as much money on this day that really worth the extra cost and preserve the memories of the best photos. In a normal digital camera to capture losing clarity, focus and good lighting for a professional camera. Of course this is assuming you are using a professional photographer, I also recommend. With an anchor photographers moments can lead to significant losses, interruptions, so the time was lost and confiscated their work eventaully general disappointment and regret not spending the extra money for a good photographer.
As a photographer, told me not to take the risk. If there are pictures of children or something reproducible, then by all means go to him. But I am a very good photographer and would never be a wedding. Just once. You need to get it right, or you have nothing to remember.
Money for a photographer. Its more important that the cake now! :-)
As a photographer, told me not to take the risk. If there are pictures of children or something reproducible, then by all means go to him. But I am a very good photographer and would never be a wedding. Just once. You need to get it right, or you have nothing to remember.
Money for a photographer. Its more important that the cake now! :-)
What we did was to distribute disposable cameras to be unique among the guests and had the opportunity again to our parents after the reception. It turned out well, I had a friend who had presented a good professional camera for the time, the images of the day. He saved money. Good luck.
Post a Comment